(For a good in-depth discussion and critique of the various paraphrase nominalist views, see Burgess and Rosen (1997).). From Wordnik.com. [Platonism in Metaphysics] Reference
And be a skeptic or nominalist about social kinds. From Wordnik.com. [Archive 2008-11-01] Reference
Ockham was emphatically a nominalist in this sense. From Wordnik.com. [William of Ockham] Reference
If a nominalist uses the term, it is a mere flatus vocis. From Wordnik.com. [Nature and Grace: Selections from the Summa Theologica of Thomas Aquinas] Reference
This makes Mill in more recent terminology a nominalist. From Wordnik.com. [John Stuart Mill] Reference
Yet Marsilius never qualified himself as a nominalist or follower of Ockham. From Wordnik.com. [Marsilius of Inghen] Reference
Where does the nominalist find the required collection of concrete entities?. From Wordnik.com. [Philosophy of Mathematics] Reference
There is a very well-known nominalist response to the One Over Many argument. From Wordnik.com. [Platonism in Metaphysics] Reference
The education in Erfurt and Leipzig included the reading of nominalist authors. From Wordnik.com. [Marsilius of Inghen] Reference
It would seem, therefore, that a nominalist cannot consistently affirm that theory. From Wordnik.com. [Metaphysics] Reference
I am not a collectivist, not even a Hegelian, and almost as much a nominalist as he is. From Wordnik.com. ['The Sense of Order': An Exchange] Reference
We saw in Principles, to the contrary, the nominalist inclination which may support (B). From Wordnik.com. [Descartes' Theory of Ideas] Reference
Some views in the philosophy of mathematics are anti-nominalist without being platonist. From Wordnik.com. [Platonism in the Philosophy of Mathematics] Reference
Can a strict nominalist such as Ockham really accept quantification over possible beings?. From Wordnik.com. [The Statue of a Writer] Reference
Although the nominalist theory is not clearly worked out here, it is clearly related to the. From Wordnik.com. [Pragmatism] Reference
But, the nominalist claims, there is no kind of entity beyond the individual instances of each kind. From Wordnik.com. [Natural Kinds] Reference
He generally takes a nominalist line, and will have no truck with propositions expressed by sentences. From Wordnik.com. [William Heytesbury] Reference
We noted that LeÅniewski, persuaded by his argument against Twardowski's general objects, was a nominalist. From Wordnik.com. [StanisÅaw LeÅniewski] Reference
For Descartes, every existing thing is indeed a particular, and that will satisfy his nominalist inclinations. From Wordnik.com. [Descartes' Theory of Ideas] Reference
Ockham was a nominalist, indeed he is the person whose name is perhaps most famously associated with nominalism. From Wordnik.com. [William of Ockham] Reference
Each declares himself a moralist in philosophy, a nominalist in world view, and an antitotalitarian in politics. From Wordnik.com. [Paris: Moses and Polytheism] Reference
If this is what propositions are, then the nominalist needs a satisfactory nominalistic account of ordered sets. From Wordnik.com. [Nominalism in Metaphysics] Reference
At the end of their article, Lyon and Colyvan also review a few possible moves the nominalist can make in response. From Wordnik.com. [Explanation in Mathematics] Reference
For this reason nominalist ante rem structuralism is sometimes described as “structuralism without structures”. From Wordnik.com. [Philosophy of Mathematics] Reference
Both the nominalist and realist solutions to Porphyry's problem are thus too simplistic and lack proper distinction. From Wordnik.com. [Albert the Great] Reference
Another nominalist option is to deny that there are propositions and any entities that play their theoretical roles. From Wordnik.com. [Nominalism in Metaphysics] Reference
Or the substance monist might be a nihilist for t2 counted by u1, by being an eliminative nominalist about properties. From Wordnik.com. [Monism] Reference
The nominalist structuralist denies that any concrete physical system is the unique intended interpretation of analysis. From Wordnik.com. [Philosophy of Mathematics] Reference
He is, arguably, the greatest logician of the Middle Ages and is equally famous as the first great nominalist philosopher. From Wordnik.com. [Peter Abelard] Reference
The possibility of being a nominalist in one sense but not in the other has been exemplified in the history of philosophy. From Wordnik.com. [Nominalism in Metaphysics] Reference
This sounds like a traditional nominalist position: there are no genuinely universal beings, we merely apply the same term. From Wordnik.com. [Descartes' Theory of Ideas] Reference
But does that mean we must say that essences are universal beings, and thus inconsistent with Descartes 'nominalist leanings?. From Wordnik.com. [Descartes' Theory of Ideas] Reference
And the entities invoked (objects, properties, and times) should be perfectly familiar to all but the most austere nominalist. From Wordnik.com. [The Metaphysics of Causation] Reference
For example, the nominalist might take the world to be made up of individuals, which can be classified as kinds in a natural way. From Wordnik.com. [Natural Kinds] Reference
The resemblance nominalist ontology is an ontology of resembling particulars like horses, atoms, houses, stars, men (and classes). From Wordnik.com. [Nominalism in Metaphysics] Reference
In philosophy, he defended a range of materialist, nominalist, and empiricist views against Cartesian and Aristotelian alternatives. From Wordnik.com. [Thomas Hobbes] Reference
For Ockham, only individ - uals exist; man as an abstract category is a creation of the mind — such is his essentially nominalist thesis. From Wordnik.com. [Dictionary of the History of Ideas] Reference
But this seems to be based on the thought that what makes a position nominalist is the rejection of properties, numbers, propositions, etc. From Wordnik.com. [Nominalism in Metaphysics] Reference
Where Husserl's categories were of abstract meanings, LeÅniewski, ever the nominalist, substituted categories of (concrete) expressions. From Wordnik.com. [StanisÅaw LeÅniewski] Reference
LearnThatWord and the Open Dictionary of English are programs by LearnThat Foundation, a 501(c)3 nonprofit.
Questions? Feedback? We want to hear from you!
Email us
or click here for instant support.
Copyright © 2005 and after - LearnThat Foundation. Patents pending.

