So this is a lower limit t-statistic, 5. gridcell.    From Wordnik.com.  [Jones et al [1998]: Gridcell Correlations « Climate Audit] Reference

In fact, the correct t-statistic is 99.99% significant.    From Wordnik.com.  [Polar Urals #3: Crossdating « Climate Audit] Reference

For 95% significance, the t-statistic needs to be about 9.28.    From Wordnik.com.  [Some Random Walk Recipes « Climate Audit] Reference

With small samples lt 20 use the t-statistic, not the z-score.    From Wordnik.com.  [Warmest in a Millll-yun Years « Climate Audit] Reference

For independent residuals, a t-statistic of about 2 is significant.    From Wordnik.com.  [Jones et al [1998]: Verifying Reported Gridcell Correlations « Climate Audit] Reference

Otherwise you might be comparing your “t-statistic” to the wrong critical values.    From Wordnik.com.  [Spurious Significance #2 : Granger and Newbold 1974 « Climate Audit] Reference

Phillips showed that the t-statistic does not settle down as N increases, but diverges.    From Wordnik.com.  [AR1 on First Differences « Climate Audit] Reference

In fact, "spurious significance" is shown 68% of the time with a conventional t-statistic.    From Wordnik.com.  [Some Random Walk Recipes « Climate Audit] Reference

The t-statistic in a canned linear regression is an example of an "OLS-based Wald statistic".    From Wordnik.com.  [More on Satellite Arima: Vogelsang [1998] « Climate Audit] Reference

There are over 1000 correlations taken here — so that a t-statistic with 95% is not sufficient.    From Wordnik.com.  [Polar Urals #3: Crossdating « Climate Audit] Reference

The adjusted r-squared was -0.002; the t-statistic was only 0.85 and the DW an unbelievable 0.06.    From Wordnik.com.  [Bristlecones, Foxtails and Temperature « Climate Audit] Reference

The t-statistic from OLS tables assumes independence, which is not the case in autocorrelated series.    From Wordnik.com.  [Jones et al [1998]: Gridcell Correlations « Climate Audit] Reference

If you use the true t-statistic allowing for autocorrelation, my guess is that it would be much higher.    From Wordnik.com.  [Jones et al [1998]: Confidence Intervals « Climate Audit] Reference

Here the correlation is -0.005; r2 is 0.000; adjusted r2 is -0.052; t-statistic is -0.009 and DW is 0.869.    From Wordnik.com.  [Bristlecones, Foxtails and Temperature « Climate Audit] Reference

A t-statistic seems to me to be a more sensible approach, but there are no surprises in the t-statistics here.    From Wordnik.com.  [Jones et al [1998]: Gridcell Correlations « Climate Audit] Reference

The adjusted r-squared is only 0.056; the t-statistic is a mere 1.29 not significant and DW is a ghastly 0.36.    From Wordnik.com.  [Bristlecones, Foxtails and Temperature « Climate Audit] Reference

In each case, the script shows the trend line, the slope coefficient and the OLS t-statistic usual significance 1.96.    From Wordnik.com.  [Some Random Walk Recipes « Climate Audit] Reference

The insignificance of the t-statistic for the rw regressor make the adjustment described previously even more bizarre.    From Wordnik.com.  [Tornetrask Regressions « Climate Audit] Reference

However, with Newey-West standard errors, which is much more realistic with smoothed data, the t-statistic is only 1.15.    From Wordnik.com.  [Thompson et al [1993] on Dunde « Climate Audit] Reference

The t-statistic for the assigned start date of 914 is slightly elevated, but not to the significance of well-dated cores.    From Wordnik.com.  [Polar Urals #3: Crossdating « Climate Audit] Reference

Clarifications: When you talk about a "t", the t-statistic in.    From Wordnik.com.  [Library of Economics and Liberty] Reference

The t-statistic is how you measure the significance of a coefficient in a regression.    From Wordnik.com.  [RealClimate] Reference

A search volume of 5,225 voxels was defined using the t-statistic for the effect Hated face > Neutral faces.    From Wordnik.com.  [PLoS ONE Alerts: New Articles] Reference

Stocks Intercept MCt BMt R2 All but Tiny Stocks 1927-2006 Slope 958 1.15 -0.07 0.21 0.03 t-statistic 3.69 -1.98 3.29 1927-1963.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

1963-2006 Slope 1710 2.40 -0.40 0.36 0.01 t-statistic 5.71 -5.33 4.46 28.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

The OLS t-statistic is 2.3 and with Newey-West standard errors, it’s about the same.    From Wordnik.com.  [Thompson et al [1993] on Dunde « Climate Audit] Reference

The problem isn’t limited to the t-statistic, but applies to many other common statistics.    From Wordnik.com.  [Spurious Significance #4: Phillips [1986] « Climate Audit] Reference

The OLS t-statistic is 4.94.    From Wordnik.com.  [Thompson et al [1993] on Dunde « Climate Audit] Reference

0.00022 with a t-statistic of 2.3 "and isn't even joking.    From Wordnik.com.  [I'm A Stranger Here Myself]

4. my calculation of the t-statistic.    From Wordnik.com.  [Jones et al [1998]: Gridcell Correlations « Climate Audit] Reference

"What was the t-statistic on the year term, Max?.    From Wordnik.com.  [RealClimate] Reference

K = 60 Slope 1024 1.31 -0.08 0.14 -0.27 0.22 -0.57 0.04 -0.05 t-statistic 3.60 -2.04.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

Slope 650 1.60 -0.40 0.13 -0.42 0.01 -0.35 0.03 t-statistic 4.99 -3.30 1.57 -4.70 0.10 -1.73.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

= 36 Slope 547 1.02 -0.10 0.12 -0.26 0.48 0.06 0.06 t-statistic 2.72 -2.10 1.22 -1.77 3.94 0.30.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

K = 60 Slope 520 1.39 -0.11 0.09 -0.22 0.21 0.06 0.06 t-statistic 3.55 -2.60 0.84 -1.91 2.12 0.51.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

138 1.01 -0.59 0.06 -0.65 0.19 -0.77 0.03 -0.47 t-statistic 1.70 -2.37 0.47 -2.85 0.86 -1.16 -1.65.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

1137 1.29 -0.08 0.16 -0.21 0.21 -0.77 0.04 -0.00 t-statistic 3.40 -1.93 2.03 -2.12 2.38 -5.17 -0.04.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

K = 36 Slope 138 0.98 -0.59 0.09 -0.58 0.12 -0.77 0.03 t-statistic 1.66 -2.32 0.65 -2.76 0.46 -1.15.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference