But the "undecidable" stuff needs a lot more care. From Wordnik.com. [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference
Recall my point about decidable/undecidable issues. From Wordnik.com. [An Ill Wind in Tortuca - The Panda's Thumb] Reference
But what do you mean by scientifically undecidable?. From Wordnik.com. [Bunny and a Book] Reference
Consistency means that there is nothing undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [Please Tell Me What “God” Means] Reference
We can say "reality has some undecidable propositions.". From Wordnik.com. [What Logic is and isn't...] Reference
Victorianizes aeration inquisition accomplishment undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [The Volokh Conspiracy » IN DEFENSE OF INTERNMENT, Part 4 (Or, “The Robinson Rebuttal”):] Reference
There is no such things that are “undecidable” in principle. From Wordnik.com. [Please Tell Me What “God” Means] Reference
I guess Steve would manage to make his theorems on PLSR undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [von Storch et al 2004 in IPCC AR4 « Climate Audit] Reference
My point is that the issue is formally and substantively undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [Reply to my critics] Reference
This relentless injustice is why the ordeal of the undecidable is never past. From Wordnik.com. [Jacques Derrida] Reference
Viewed as a first-order theory, sentences in Quantum Mechanics are undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [Theories of Everything and Godel's theorem] Reference
The undecidable, for Derrida, is not mere oscillation between two significations. From Wordnik.com. [Jacques Derrida] Reference
Paul Cohen did indeed show that the theorem is undecidable by standard set theory. From Wordnik.com. [An Infinity of Points] Reference
If something seems to be undecidable in system M, use a larger system that contains M. From Wordnik.com. [Please Tell Me What “God” Means] Reference
The other primitive man may or may not be dangerous; this is undecidable; the metaphor. From Wordnik.com. [Professing Literature: John Guillory's Misreading of Paul de Man] Reference
Thus, the middle Wittgenstein rejects undecidable mathematical propositions on two grounds. From Wordnik.com. [Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics] Reference
Perhaps the question was even formally undecidable (say from the usual axioms of mathematics). From Wordnik.com. [Wolfram Blog : The Prize Is Won; The Simplest Universal Turing Machine Is Proved] Reference
And some are like the undecidable propositions in a consistently developed mathematical system. From Wordnik.com. [The Angels and Us] Reference
This is where the decidable/undecidable dichotomy I mentioned before comes back into the picture. From Wordnik.com. [An Ill Wind in Tortuca - The Panda's Thumb] Reference
The clash between Blakean and Wordsworthian perspectives in "Twelfth Morning," then, is not undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [Elizabeth Bishop and the Wordsworth of _Lyrical Ballads_: Sentimentalism, Straw Men, and Misprision] Reference
A calculus may be undecidable in which case one needs to determine which decidable fragment to implement. From Wordnik.com. [Automated Reasoning] Reference
Insofar as the difference is undecidable, it destabilizes the original decision that instituted the hierarchy. From Wordnik.com. [Jacques Derrida] Reference
It transpires that the theory of arithmetic (technically, Peano arithmetic) is both incomplete and undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [Theories of Everything and Godel's theorem] Reference
He argues that true sentences undecidable in Peano Arithmetic can only be proved by means of higher-order concepts. From Wordnik.com. [Philosophy of Mathematics] Reference
However, undecidable statements which are free from self-reference have been found in various branches of mathematics. From Wordnik.com. [Theories of Everything and Godel's theorem] Reference
Wittgenstein's second reason for rejecting an undecidable mathematical proposition is that it is a contradiction-in-terms. From Wordnik.com. [Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics] Reference
Even in the most perfectly constructed mathematical system, some propositions will be found undecidable as to their truth or falsity. From Wordnik.com. [The Angels and Us] Reference
The set of sentences of GL with propositional quantifiers that is arithmetically valid turns out to be undecidable (Shavrukov (1997)). From Wordnik.com. [Provability Logic] Reference
The problem for anyone applying the scientific method to issues like this is that all undecidable propositions are logically equivalent. From Wordnik.com. [too-rye-aye] Reference
Without an independent method to measure intelligence and knowledge of arbitrary entities, your statement is scientifically undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [Bunny and a Book] Reference
We can show that we can use mathematics to show that all mathematical systems include either undecidable propositions or inconsistencies. From Wordnik.com. [Fisking Geisler and McDowell...] Reference
Finsler 1926 applies Richard's paradox in order to produce metamathematical results, in particular ˜formally undecidable propositions™. From Wordnik.com. [Paradoxes and Contemporary Logic] Reference
We think that the point is undecidable, and we have previously adduced testi - mony from latest antiquity in support of this conclu - sion. From Wordnik.com. [INFINITY] Reference
Most problems in automatic verification are either undecidable, or intractable. From Wordnik.com. [Slashdot] Reference
It is troubling because it is undecidable, neither fact nor fiction, not alive or dead. From Wordnik.com. [openDemocracy] Reference
It seems to me that essentially all of the material about "Famous undecidable statements" is wrong. From Wordnik.com. [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference
The golem is troubling because it is undecidable, as is Life-Writing, whether its memoir, biography etc. From Wordnik.com. [openDemocracy] Reference
"undecidable" is certainly not the same thing as "not provable within ZF", and choice is independent of ZF, not undecidable. From Wordnik.com. [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference
LearnThatWord and the Open Dictionary of English are programs by LearnThat Foundation, a 501(c)3 nonprofit.
Questions? Feedback? We want to hear from you!
Email us
or click here for instant support.
Copyright © 2005 and after - LearnThat Foundation. Patents pending.

