This prevents us from instantiating the quantifier. From Wordnik.com. [Plural Quantification] Reference
Note the lack of any quantifier before "Democrats". From Wordnik.com. [Clinton Camp: Obama Shouldn't Get Away With Writing Off West Virginia Loss] Reference
The quantifier ˜ x™ is said to bind the variable. From Wordnik.com. [Logical Form] Reference
This quantifier-elimination result was used by Mostowski. From Wordnik.com. [The Algebra of Logic Tradition] Reference
A quantifier binds each occurrence of its variable, as in. From Wordnik.com. [Logical Form] Reference
Note that the calculus just described is quantifier-free. From Wordnik.com. [The Epsilon Calculus] Reference
Similarly, if we add more than one generalized quantifier. From Wordnik.com. [Generalized Quantifiers] Reference
(In this example there is one quantifier: ˜all of them™). From Wordnik.com. [Model Theory] Reference
They reinterpret KP by restricting its universal quantifier. From Wordnik.com. [Fitch's Paradox of Knowability] Reference
(Θx1) ¦ (Θxn) followed by a quantifier-free expression. From Wordnik.com. [Automated Reasoning] Reference
A single quantifier can bind multiple argument positions, as in. From Wordnik.com. [Logical Form] Reference
We now have a precise notion of a generalized quantifier, of which. From Wordnik.com. [Generalized Quantifiers] Reference
Because my research needs you more than it needs a stats quantifier. From Wordnik.com. [Dreamfall]
This theory uses a quantifier "", which does not imply existence. From Wordnik.com. [Intentionality] Reference
That is because in intuitionistic logic the quantifier exchange rule. From Wordnik.com. [Fitch's Paradox of Knowability] Reference
The quantifier should express neither “there is” nor “there exists”. From Wordnik.com. [Nonexistent Objects] Reference
In logical languages, quantifier expressions are variable-binding operators. From Wordnik.com. [Generalized Quantifiers] Reference
For such a proposition involves a quantifier as part of a complex predicate. From Wordnik.com. [Logical Form] Reference
LeÅniewski always used the expression ˜particular quantifier™ rather than. From Wordnik.com. [StanisÅaw LeÅniewski] Reference
Q (equality), and logical constants like the universal quantifier and implication. From Wordnik.com. [Paradoxes and Contemporary Logic] Reference
Prime formulas (and hence quantifier-free formulas) are decidable and stable in HA. From Wordnik.com. [Intuitionistic Logic] Reference
Every statement involving a generalized quantifier Q takes place within some universe M. From Wordnik.com. [Generalized Quantifiers] Reference
Correlatively, a name can be replaced with a variable bound by an existential quantifier. From Wordnik.com. [Logical Form] Reference
This illustrates that the instantiation of a (universal) quantifier involves substitution. From Wordnik.com. [Combinatory Logic] Reference
By intuitionistic logic with the decidability of quantifier-free arithmetical formulas, HA proves. From Wordnik.com. [Intuitionistic Logic] Reference
The rules of inference for Frege's logic capture this central feature of the universal quantifier. From Wordnik.com. [Logical Form] Reference
(Note that Putnam is clear that the phenomenon he is describing isn't mere quantifier-restriction.). From Wordnik.com. [Propositions] Reference
Thus, is now taken to denote the universal quantifier, also written , which is the mapping given by. From Wordnik.com. [Generalized Quantifiers] Reference
These are the usual quantifier rules, liberalized to apply to any categories of variable in batches of one or more. From Wordnik.com. [StanisÅaw LeÅniewski] Reference
Fourth, the quantifier rules provide no indication as to what terms or free variables must be used in their deployment. From Wordnik.com. [Automated Reasoning] Reference
We will follow this practice of calling statements involving one of these quantifier phrases ˜quantified statements™. From Wordnik.com. [Gottlob Frege] Reference
In the Sneedean approach the “empirical claim” of the theory is formulated by using an existential quantifier for the. From Wordnik.com. [Structuralism in Physics] Reference
More important for metalogical purposes is the fact that the universal quantifier too is syncategorematic in LeÅniewski. From Wordnik.com. [StanisÅaw LeÅniewski] Reference
The correct insight of this understanding is that neither objects nor expressions are what quantifier expressions range over. From Wordnik.com. [StanisÅaw LeÅniewski] Reference
An occurrence of a variable x in a formula A is bound if it is within the scope of a quantifier x or x, otherwise free. From Wordnik.com. [Intuitionistic Logic] Reference
LeÅniewski does not need to give rules for many different kinds of universal quantifier, but gives rules for the one sort in one go. From Wordnik.com. [StanisÅaw LeÅniewski] Reference
(Qk) Ïk, where the quantifier free formula Ïk asserts the truth of Ï for all tuples up to the kth tuple of variables arising from. From Wordnik.com. [Kurt Gödel] Reference
There is room for abbreviatory definitions, and indeed LeÅniewski “inoffically” used one himself, that of the particular quantifier. From Wordnik.com. [StanisÅaw LeÅniewski] Reference
LearnThatWord and the Open Dictionary of English are programs by LearnThat Foundation, a 501(c)3 nonprofit.
Questions? Feedback? We want to hear from you!
Email us
or click here for instant support.
Copyright © 2005 and after - LearnThat Foundation. Patents pending.