Their government is based on bicameralism.    From LearnThat.org. 

The greatest evil of bicameralism is that the bills are written by conference committees instead of legislatures.    From Wordnik.com.  [Matthew Yglesias » Senate “What Ifs”] Reference

Also, I strongly agree that bicameralism is not as clever as we’re taught in Schoolhouse Rock.    From Wordnik.com.  [Matthew Yglesias » Senate “What Ifs”] Reference

How is bicameralism satisfied with this procedure?.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Is the Slaughter Solution constitutional?] Reference

How is bicameralism satisfied with this procedure?!.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Is the Slaughter Solution constitutional?] Reference

City of New York and the bicameralism requirements.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » President to Seek Line-Item Veto] Reference

Nevertheless, 49 out of 50 states choose bicameralism.    From Wordnik.com.  [Jacob T. Levy] Reference

Both of those avenues meet the bicameralism requirement.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Is the Slaughter Solution constitutional?] Reference

“Word for word” is necessary to meet the bicameralism requirement.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » “It May Be Clever, but It Is Not Constitutional”] Reference

As for bicameralism, I am not arguing that point and would agree with you.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Does Marshall Field v. Clark Preclude a Challenge to “Deem and Pass”?] Reference

You must pass what the Senate passed word for word to satisfy bicameralism.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » “It May Be Clever, but It Is Not Constitutional”] Reference

You must pass what the Senate passed (word for word) to satisfy bicameralism.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » “It May Be Clever, but It Is Not Constitutional”] Reference

The procedure complies with Clinton v. City of New York and the bicameralism requirements.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » President to Seek Line-Item Veto] Reference

These are sometimes collectively referred to as the requirements of bicameralism and presentment.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » A Constitutional Slaughter Solution?] Reference

All the bicameralism clause does, on its own, is require that public law be agreed to by both chambers.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Does Marshall Field v. Clark Preclude a Challenge to “Deem and Pass”?] Reference

Not every action taken by either House is subject to the bicameralism and presentment requirements of Art.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Is the Slaughter Solution constitutional?] Reference

Not every action taken by either House is subject to the bicameralism and presentment requirements of Art. I.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Is the Slaughter Solution constitutional?] Reference

If the House does not pass exactly the same bill the Senate passed, then the bicameralism requirement is not met.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Does Marshall Field v. Clark Preclude a Challenge to “Deem and Pass”?] Reference

This is the crux of the matter, whether the Constitutional requirement of bicameralism and presentment has been met.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Is the Slaughter Solution constitutional?] Reference

This provides the bicameralism that some folks think is a necessary requirement for self-awareness and consciousness.    From Wordnik.com.  [REVIEW: Wake by Robert J. Sawyer] Reference

– If the House does not pass exactly the same bill the Senate passed, then the bicameralism requirement is not met –.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Does Marshall Field v. Clark Preclude a Challenge to “Deem and Pass”?] Reference

In order to satisfy the requirements of bicameralism and presentment, the two houses must pass bills with identical language.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » A Constitutional Slaughter Solution?] Reference

New York the line-item veto case, would seem to interpret the bicameralism requirement in a fairly rigid and formalistic way.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Would “Deem & Pass” Survive Judicial Review?] Reference

The important point I would make is that bicameralism and the presidential veto already create a large bias toward the status quo.    From Wordnik.com.  [Matthew Yglesias » Does the Filibuster Produce Centrist Policy Outcomes?] Reference

It's the text that has survived the structural checks of bicameralism and presentment, and it's the text itself that's authoritative.    From Wordnik.com.  [Ted Kennedy is unhappy with Supreme Court confirmation hearings.] Reference

In practice, there is a strong element of bicameralism.    From Wordnik.com.  [Center for American Progress Action Fund] Reference

Does the quality of legislation suffer from the absence of bicameralism?.    From Wordnik.com.  [Stubborn Facts] Reference

Senator Faulkner told a conference on bicameralism at Parliament House yesterday.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Canberra Times] Reference

Australian Senate Practice quotes an interesting argument for Westminster bicameralism.    From Wordnik.com.  [Fruits and Votes] Reference

The U.S. has the triple crown of plausible deniability: federalism, separation of powers and bicameralism.    From Wordnik.com.  [Center for American Progress Action Fund] Reference

What Slaughter and Pelosi here are attempting here is a blatant violation of the principles of bicameralism and presentment.    From Wordnik.com.  [HolyCoast.com] Reference

First, I don’t think the framers’ bicameralism imperative is constitutionally satiated by Slaughter’s 3-card monty.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Is the Slaughter Solution constitutional?] Reference

It’s true that the Founding Fathers wanted checks and balances, but this is why we have bicameralism and presidential veto power.    From Wordnik.com.  [Matthew Yglesias » If The Founders Had Wanted a Supermajority Requirement for the Senate, They Could Have Put One in the Constitution] Reference

Three cheers for bicameralism.    From Wordnik.com.  [The New 'Separate but Equal'] Reference

"This is an improper purpose under the bicameralism requirements of Article I.    From Wordnik.com.  [FOXNews.com] Reference

"This is an improper purpose under the bicameralism requirements of Article I, Section 7 of the U.S.    From Wordnik.com.  [News for Richmond Times-Dispatch] Reference

"The question of bicameralism has been accepted.    From Wordnik.com.  [ANC Daily News Briefing] Reference