(The proclaimer became the proclaimed, in Bultmann's famous phrase.).    From Wordnik.com.  [Who Do Men Say That I Am?] Reference

Whereas Bultmann was not satisfied with the mystery.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Inerrancy of Ecclesiastes 9:2-6] Reference

Chrisendom has a post on Bultmann and the incarnation.    From Wordnik.com.  [I'm Honored!] Reference

In theology, few pay much attention to Bultmann anymore.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Inerrancy of Ecclesiastes 9:2-6] Reference

Was a bit busy with Kant, Piaget, and Bultmann among others then.    From Wordnik.com.  [Okay, how many?] Reference

Bultmann thinks incompatible with using electric lights and radios.    From Wordnik.com.  [Warranted Christian Belief] Reference

Another point about Schweitzer, and Bultmann, too, for that matter.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Inerrancy of Ecclesiastes 9:2-6] Reference

Bultmann posed genuine questions and framed them in very interesting ways.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Inerrancy of Ecclesiastes 9:2-6] Reference

For example, when Bultmann and other theologians speak of “de-mythologizing” the.    From Wordnik.com.  [Dictionary of the History of Ideas] Reference

Those criticisms were not answered by Bultmann and they are, I believe, unanswerable.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Inerrancy of Ecclesiastes 9:2-6] Reference

I appreciate what you have to say, and I take your point about Bultmann and Robinson.    From Wordnik.com.  [Classic Liberal?] Reference

Bultmann developed the method of FORM-CRITICISM as a radical methodological SKEPTICISM.    From Wordnik.com.  [Concise Dictionary of Religion] Reference

John, your description of Schweitzer's view sounds just like my understanding of Bultmann.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Inerrancy of Ecclesiastes 9:2-6] Reference

To be sure, that's physics; perhaps the problem would be (as Bultmann suggests) with medicine.    From Wordnik.com.  [Warranted Christian Belief] Reference

There were also developments in critical method which gave Bultmann, and other scholars, pause.    From Wordnik.com.  [Who Do Men Say That I Am?] Reference

Are you saying you're in the latter category, and hold a view closer to Bultmann than to Wells?.    From Wordnik.com.  [Mythicists and Creationists] Reference

Bultmann was right to translate the phrase: “I consecrate myself” by “I sacrifice myself”.    From Wordnik.com.  [Chrism Mass in Rome [Update]] Reference

MCGRATH: Are you saying you're in the latter category, and hold a view closer to Bultmann than to Wells?.    From Wordnik.com.  [Mythicists and Creationists] Reference

To require this is to do precisely what Bultmann warned about, to make rejection of evolution a necessity.    From Wordnik.com.  [Archive 2007-09-01] Reference

John, I think that Bultmann can be fairly criticized for his statements about what "modern man cannot believe.".    From Wordnik.com.  [The Inerrancy of Ecclesiastes 9:2-6] Reference

I'm thinking that James McGrath might be closer to the positions of Schweitzer as opposed to Bultmann than he realizes.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Inerrancy of Ecclesiastes 9:2-6] Reference

A particularly thought-provoking statement is that Bultmann was clearly wrong about what "modern man" simply cannot accept.    From Wordnik.com.  [Questions Of Faith] Reference

You are influenced by thinkers like Bultmann and Bishop Spong.    From Wordnik.com.  [UUpdates - All updates] Reference

Thomas is exactly the kind of text that Bultmann would have loved.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Forbidden Gospels] Reference

Naturally enough, when doing a theology degree, we covered Bultmann.    From Wordnik.com.  [Earliest Christian History] Reference

Which simply means that Bultmann was to the left of classic Liberalism.    From Wordnik.com.  [Triablogue] Reference

Kerr seems to understate the importance of Bultmann even for British exegetes.    From Wordnik.com.  [Joseph S. O'Leary homepage] Reference

Well, I've never heard of Bultmann and I've heard of but never actually read Spong.    From Wordnik.com.  [UUpdates - All updates] Reference

At best, the "theology" of Bultmann and Robinson is functionally equivalent to atheism.    From Wordnik.com.  [Triablogue] Reference