Title: Kaluza-Klein gravitons are negative energy dust in brane cosmology.    From Wordnik.com.  [Bleeding-edge Science; don't ask me to explain these] Reference

For Gravitational Forces, the exchange particles are called gravitons but these haven't been observed yet.    From Wordnik.com.  [Recently Uploaded Slideshows] Reference

Many things predicted by the theory of relativity, such as gravitons, have never been found despite much searching for them.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference

"gravitons" or the "metric tensor" are composite fields in the bulk of spacetime (that is however non-emergent).    From Wordnik.com.  [The Reference Frame] Reference

No one has detected gravitons, and likely never will.    From Wordnik.com.  [Lynn Margulis: "Definitely a Darwinist" - The Panda's Thumb] Reference

The exchange of gravitons of some sort causes gravity.    From Wordnik.com.  [Guest Post: Joe Polchinski on Science or Sociology?] Reference

July 16, 2009 at 5:52 pm iz eatin ur gravitons and gravioles….    From Wordnik.com.  [I iz in ur space-time continuum, upsetting - Lolcats 'n' Funny Pictures of Cats - I Can Has Cheezburger?] Reference

A bulk perspective now instead of “an anisotropy of gravitons?”.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Lopsided Universe] Reference

As for properties, gravitons are spin 2 bosons with a rest mass of zero.    From Wordnik.com.  [Lynn Margulis: "Definitely a Darwinist" - The Panda's Thumb] Reference

So are we getting some data which is related to an anisotropy of gravitons?.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Lopsided Universe] Reference

We are not likely to encounter gravitons in our accelerators any time soon.    From Wordnik.com.  [Causal Consciousness – Science of Mind] Reference

This information leads to some wonderful questions: Do gravitons have mass?.    From Wordnik.com.  [Darwinism, What's the Appeal?] Reference

It's not magic it's collective magnetic forces gravitons at work way to GO HEELS.    From Wordnik.com.  [meet me in...] Reference

If you tally up the number of gravitons flying around you get an infinite integer.    From Wordnik.com.  [Not Even Wrong] Reference

I would be much more pleased if gravitons “glued” me to the Earth like a magnet.    From Wordnik.com.  [Does Space Expand?] Reference

It so happened that the gravitons he collected came mostly from beneath Ms. Thadeau.    From Wordnik.com.  [High School Days] Reference

Or, do you mean sophisticated newish ideas that gravitons are leaking into other dimensions, etc?.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dark, Misleading Force] Reference

This data might be related to gravitons stretched out an imprinted on the post inflationary universe.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Lopsided Universe] Reference

Now for gravity waves its quantization for strong fields results in gravitons that couple to each other.    From Wordnik.com.  [Dark Matter: Still Dark.] Reference

But here's the cool thing: let's say that gravitons are not bound to this sphere but the other 3 forces are.    From Wordnik.com.  [Astronomers Find Black Holes Do Not Absorb Dark Matter | Universe Today] Reference

KK gravitons may be produced via quantum fluctuations during a de Sitter (dS) inflating phase of our brane universe.    From Wordnik.com.  [Bleeding-edge Science; don't ask me to explain these] Reference

Calibrating the system basically consisted of flushing the blocked gravitons caused by the rapid temperature shifts.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Best and The Brightest] Reference

When the masses are receding, the received gravitons are redshifted, so they have less energy than the normally do, E = hf.    From Wordnik.com.  [Guest Post: Joe Polchinski on Science or Sociology?] Reference

Thus production of even a tiny amount of KK gravitons may eventually have a significant impact on the late-time brane cosmology.    From Wordnik.com.  [Bleeding-edge Science; don't ask me to explain these] Reference

Gravity waves are not the same as gravitons though.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]]

General relativity doesn't predict gravitons at all.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference

Other theories of gravity may not require gravitons at all.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]]

What is the entangled pair of gravitons if quantum gravity exists?.    From Wordnik.com.  [California Literary Review] Reference

No, for gravitons to be a counterexample to GR, they must be predicted by it.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]]

Without GR gravitons would not be expected; with GR people do expect to find them.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]]

Or just increasing the flux of spin-1 gravitons when you decrease the cross-section.    From Wordnik.com.  [ScienceBlogs Channel : Life Science] Reference

By the way, gravitons relate to quantum field theories, and were not in the original GR.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference

There quantum entanglement and apparently also in gravity, as no gravitons can be found.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference

How about this: raise private capital for searching for gravitons to support your philosophy.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference

LIGO is set up (at an expense of hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars) to detect gravitons.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]]

LIGO is set up (at an expense of hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars) to detect gravitons.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference

Field theories typically deny action at a distance (and predict never-found particles like gravitons).    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference

And, uh, since none of the gauge theories have gotten there yet, Andy, not one dollar has been spent looking for gravitons.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]] Reference

On what basis do you claim that the non-observance of gravitons is a counterexample to GR rather than a counterexample to QM?.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]]

But by your logic we could rightly conclude that the flaw is with QM rather than GR -- without QM gravitons would not be expected either.    From Wordnik.com.  [Conservapedia - Recent changes [en]]