Graph isomorphism is a weird sort of central problem in CS theory.    From Wordnik.com.  [October | 2006 | Impromptus] Reference

Design isomorphism is not a necessary auxiliary assumption for ID.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

Either design isomorphism is worth pursuing as an idea, or it is not.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

Design isomorphism is when a technological invention/design is later found to exist in living things.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

Although independently verified, I do not see how design isomorphism is inseparably tied to (non-human) ID itself.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

Although independently verified, I do not see how design isomorphism is inseparably tied to (non-human) ID itself.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

I think isomorphism is worth talking about because it could yield guidance in other areas of research, and indeed it has.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

My proposal regarding the human body and design isomorphism is entirely detachable from the C-value enigma, polyploidy, etc.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

If so, there would be further reason for scepticism about what Hurley calls the isomorphism hypothesis.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Unity of Consciousness] Reference

A technique known as isomorphism - which quickly spots similarities between two or more pieces of code - is one possible solution.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Register] Reference

But there is also something more: a kind of isomorphism between Darwin's Darwinism and historical Darwinism.    From Wordnik.com.  [Darwinism] Reference

William of Ockham goes well beyond Scotus in his rejection of any kind of isomorphism between words, concepts, and things.    From Wordnik.com.  [Medieval Theories of the Categories] Reference

Algebraizable logics can be characterized by the existence of this kind of isomorphism between congruences and logic filters.    From Wordnik.com.  [Propositional Consequence Relations and Algebraic Logic] Reference

The isomorphism approach offers an answer to objection 3.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Correspondence Theory of Truth] Reference

There simply is no isomorphism between reality and appearance.    From Wordnik.com.  [Ernst Mach] Reference

Is design isomorphism an independently verified auxiliary proposal?.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

I see design isomorphism as strong conceptual resources and models.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

I think you know what I'm getting at here with my isomorphism argument.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

But is there a coherent notion of structural isomorphism to be relied on here?.    From Wordnik.com.  [Memory] Reference

Recognition of this systematicity is built right into the isomorphism approach.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Correspondence Theory of Truth] Reference

When I look at the data, there is no absence of isomorphism at the genetic level.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

For any property set f, define the notion of an f-preserving isomorphism as follows.    From Wordnik.com.  [Supervenience] Reference

Using (2) it gives the isomorphism theorem for finitary and finitely algebraizable logics.    From Wordnik.com.  [Propositional Consequence Relations and Algebraic Logic] Reference

We say that two structures are isomorphic if there is an isomorphism from one to the other.    From Wordnik.com.  [First-order Model Theory] Reference

So you're admitting that someone can legitimately back up their words with design isomorphism?.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

Yes, the design isomorphism of signal amplification by alternative splicing cannot be forgotten.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

It is about whether or not their words are backed up by natural selection/design isomorphism etc.    From Wordnik.com.  [A Dubious "Opportunity" for IDers] Reference

B-preserving isomorphism between w1 and w2, then there is an A-preserving isomorphism between them.    From Wordnik.com.  [Supervenience] Reference

For any field F, up to isomorphism there is exactly one vector space over F of any given finite dimension.    From Wordnik.com.  [Algebra] Reference

A-and-B-preserving isomorphisms there must be between worlds between which there is a B-preserving isomorphism.    From Wordnik.com.  [Supervenience] Reference

B-preserving isomorphism between w1 and w2, then at least one isomorphism between them is both A-and-B-preserving.    From Wordnik.com.  [Supervenience] Reference

Once circular sets are allowed, a strengthening of extensional equality by means of a suitable isomorphism relation.    From Wordnik.com.  [Paradoxes and Contemporary Logic] Reference

In practice, it is the notion of equivalence of categories that matters and not the notion of isomorphism of categories.    From Wordnik.com.  [Category Theory] Reference

Austin (1950) rejects the isomorphism approach on the grounds that it projects the structure of our language into the world.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Correspondence Theory of Truth] Reference

This isomorphism theorem (4) is a generalization of the isomorphism theorems we encountered earlier for algebraizable logics.    From Wordnik.com.  [Propositional Consequence Relations and Algebraic Logic] Reference

Firstly, adjoints are unique up to isomorphism; that is any two left adjoints F and F 'of a functor G are naturally isomorphic.    From Wordnik.com.  [Category Theory] Reference

This isomorphism holds not only between language and reality, but extends also to thought, which mediates between language and reality.    From Wordnik.com.  [Medieval Theories of the Categories] Reference

B-properties iff for any worlds w1 and w2, every B-preserving isomorphism between w1 and w2 is an A-preserving isomorphism between them.    From Wordnik.com.  [Supervenience] Reference