Now, I am sure lots of you really support mandatory vaccination because the vaccinee benefits from the vaccine.    From Wordnik.com.  [Do they really believe that abortion is murder?] Reference

If not, though, this is one case where there’s an obvious and huge benefit to the vaccinee.    From Wordnik.com.  [Do they really believe that abortion is murder?] Reference

The first is a small infringement to benefit a large number of people, including the vaccinee; the second is a large infringement to benefit an embryo or fetus that, until sometime in the second trimester at the earliest, can’t be considered a person in any meaningful sense.    From Wordnik.com.  [Do they really believe that abortion is murder?] Reference

Dan, like I said, (a) the compulsory vaccination case was really about a fine for not getting vaccinated, not truly compulsory vaccination; and (b) vaccination actually benefits the vaccinee, and doesn’t do anything extreme to him like stop him from having children, at worst it creates a very small risk of illness, dwarfed by the protection you get from the vaccine.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Holmes’s Overratedness:] Reference

B vaccination actually benefits the vaccinee, and doesn’t do anything extreme to him like stop him from having children, at worst it creates a very small risk of illness, dwarfed by the protection you get from the vaccine.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Holmes’s Overratedness:] Reference