Peter Harvey, linguist: Spanish hypercorrection of a loanword.    From Wordnik.com.  [Spanish hypercorrection of a loanword] Reference

Oh, the “who/whom” business is absolutely hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » It’s Not the Crime, It’s the Cover-Up — Sestak Edition] Reference

Ihad only thought of the hypercorrection of 'often' and so on.    From Wordnik.com.  [On imaginary pronunciations] Reference

I see what you mean, but I think that would be hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [Plurals of acronyms, abbreviations, initialisms and single letters] Reference

I wasn't suggesting that hypercorrection explains the origins of the usage.    From Wordnik.com.  [On imaginary pronunciations] Reference

And yes, if my hypothesis is right, this could be taken as a hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [On looking well] Reference

I suspect that we are dealing with that old and curious phenomenon, hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [4 posts from July 2007] Reference

Michelle Dulak Thomson: Oh, the “who/whom” business is absolutely hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » It’s Not the Crime, It’s the Cover-Up — Sestak Edition] Reference

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Spanish hypercorrection of a loanword.    From Wordnik.com.  [Spanish hypercorrection of a loanword] Reference

What you describe is what linguists refer to as “overcorrection” or “hypercorrection.”.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » Against descriptivism and prescriptivism:] Reference

I'm not sure that hypercorrection is the explanation for "between you and I", at least not entirely.    From Wordnik.com.  [On imaginary pronunciations] Reference

But stablishment seems to be a case of hypercorrection that removes an e that really should be there.    From Wordnik.com.  [12 posts from February 2010] Reference

So perhaps even the explanation of this usage as being a hypercorrection is older than the mere 20 years Zwicky gives it.    From Wordnik.com.  [languagehat.com: THE RECENCY ILLUSION.] Reference

If the usage was ‘very frequent’ 400 years ago, hypercorrection cannot really be the whole reason for its use nowadays.    From Wordnik.com.  [Between you and ?] Reference

Besides, “for Bob and I” is argued by some linguists to be hypercorrection and possibly not really part of the grammar.    From Wordnik.com.  [Whoever v. Whomever! Cases collide! Match of the Century! « Motivated Grammar] Reference

Reading through a column about hypercorrection by Paul Mulshine, I was struck by one supposed example of hypercorrection, the use of whomever for whoever.    From Wordnik.com.  [2009 October « Motivated Grammar] Reference

It seems certain words and phrases can become open to hypercorrection, prescriptivism, logical correction, that the majority of the vocabulary strongly resists.    From Wordnik.com.  [languagehat.com: TIDAL WAVE.] Reference

I seem to remember some dusty English Language acquisition lessons and that kids have to go through hypercorrection “I did go” before settling on irregular verbs.    From Wordnik.com.  [lips inc] Reference

There are very few terms for states of mind about language - hypercorrection is one, when people over-compensate for an uncertain usage as in the case of between you and I.    From Wordnik.com.  [On imaginary pronunciations] Reference

It's possible that the spelling variant tōphus, alongside the other form tōfus, was introduced into Latin through hypercorrection and folk etymology with an imagined Greek source.    From Wordnik.com.  [Archive 2009-10-01] Reference

It covers hypercorrection (and related issues) wonderfully.    From Wordnik.com.  [Interesting Thing of the Day] Reference

This Bache attributes to hypercorrection, triggered by corrections of PST.    From Wordnik.com.  [Language Log] Reference

The classic example of hypercorrection is the use of "you and I" when "you and me" would actually be correct.    From Wordnik.com.  [Interesting Thing of the Day] Reference

One of my favorite examples of hypercorrection is the name of a dish consisting of cheese sauce over a slice of toast.    From Wordnik.com.  [Interesting Thing of the Day] Reference

Another well-worn example of hypercorrection is substituting "whom" for "who" in a sentence like "I need to call my wife, who I know is going to be upset.".    From Wordnik.com.  [Interesting Thing of the Day] Reference

Part of the problem is that, given frequent enough exposure to a particular instance of hypercorrection, even people who should know better can become confused.    From Wordnik.com.  [Interesting Thing of the Day] Reference

If you eat like Bob and I, you will be healthy. is a hypercorrection (though still probably "right" in some people's personal hypercorrected dialects, e.g. the people answering above).    From Wordnik.com.  [Ask MetaFilter] Reference

There are also cases of hypercorrection, when "if" clearly means whether: eg "?.    From Wordnik.com.  [On if and was/were] Reference

Spanish hypercorrection of a loanword.    From Wordnik.com.  [12 posts from February 2010] Reference

« Spanish hypercorrection of a loanword |.    From Wordnik.com.  [Tens and dozens] Reference

| Spanish hypercorrection of a loanword ».    From Wordnik.com.  [ISBNs and culture] Reference

"Like Bob and I" is a hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [Ask MetaFilter] Reference

There is no easy cure for hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [Interesting Thing of the Day] Reference

(3) comes from the pen of George Will, who Mulshine claims has engaged in a spot of hypercorrection; according to Mulshine, whomever ought to be whoever.    From Wordnik.com.  [2009 October « Motivated Grammar] Reference

A phenomenon known as hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [Interesting Thing of the Day] Reference

It’s always sounded to my like hypercorrection.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Volokh Conspiracy » It’s Not the Crime, It’s the Cover-Up — Sestak Edition] Reference