Therefore, according to Burley's final view, the sense/significatum dichotomy is not equivalent to the intension/extension dichotomy, the latter being a sub-division of the former.    From Wordnik.com.  [Walter Burley] Reference

Contrary to Ockham's concept of sign, it is not the logical function of referring to a significatum that stands in the foreground, but rather the sign's relation to a cognitive power.    From Wordnik.com.  [Medieval Semiotics] Reference

In the De suppositionibus and De puritate the same idea is expressed by the definition of the formal supposition as the supposition that a term has when it supposits for its significatum or for the singular objects that instantiate it.    From Wordnik.com.  [Walter Burley] Reference

What gives the sign its linguistic value is the system of differences, on the one hand between signifiers, on the other be - tween signifieds (or significata, some writers in English preferring “significatum” to “signified” as a noun).    From Wordnik.com.  [STRUCTURALISM] Reference

Behind it is the fundamental view that regardless of whether a word is used in some context or not, it always has a significatum, i.e., the universal nature or essence it signifies, which can be separated from what the word comes to mean in a specific context.    From Wordnik.com.  [Peter of Spain] Reference

On words with different meanings in virtue of a difference of accent (De vocabulis quae diversum significatum exhibent secundum differentiam accentus), ed. L.W. Daly, American Philosophical Society Memoirs 151, Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1983.    From Wordnik.com.  [John Philoponus] Reference

˜aggregates™ (the significatum of a concrete accidental term) are not identical with macro-objects, but definite aspects of them.    From Wordnik.com.  [Walter Burley] Reference

(i.e., substance and accidental form) are related to the concrete accidental term as follows: although the concrete accidental term connotes the accidental form, this latter is not its direct significatum, so that the concrete accidental term can supposit for the substance only.    From Wordnik.com.  [Johannes Sharpe] Reference

(i.e., its semantic content apprehended by the mind), the intension and the extension of a general term (i.e., the universal nature and the individuals which instantiate it), considered together, are the significatum of the general term, while the concept habens esse obiectivum in intellectu provides its sense, or cognitive meaning.    From Wordnik.com.  [Walter Burley] Reference

Whereas in his early works Burley was able to differentiate the intension of an expression (the universal form) from its extension (the individuals instantiating that universal form), in his last commentary on the Ars Vetus he distinguishes between sense (the mental universal existing in the mind as an object of understanding) and reference (significatum) of an expression, which in turn is divided into its intension (the universal) and extension (the individuals).    From Wordnik.com.  [Walter Burley] Reference

Das significatum per propositionem.    From Wordnik.com.  [William Crathorn] Reference

5. tunq enim babetur simulus moralis, nec trillitur proprie! significatum illorum verborum.    From Wordnik.com.  [Adm. rev. p. F. Lucii Ferraris ... Prompta Bibliotheca canonica, juridica, moralis, theologica ...] Reference