A most general unifier (mgu) produces the most general instance shared by two unifiable expressions.    From Wordnik.com.  [Automated Reasoning] Reference

This field, however, involves not only conjunctions and interactions, but also disjunctions and heterogeneities, and cannot be seen as fully unifiable or containable by means of a synthesis, dialectical or other.    From Wordnik.com.  [Thinking Singularity with Immanuel Kant and Paul de Man: Aesthetics, Epistemology, History and Politics] Reference

Shifting inference capabilities into the unification mechanism adds power but at a price: The existence of an mgu for two unifiable expressions may not be unique (there could actually be infinitely many), and the unification process becomes undecidable in general.    From Wordnik.com.  [Automated Reasoning] Reference

Fateh actually does exist as a coherent and easily unifiable political movement.    From Wordnik.com.  [Charlottesville Blogs] Reference

He alone rests in that eternal, unifiable life.    From Wordnik.com.  [Archbishop of Canterbury's Sermon at York Minster] Reference

As far as I can tell you can’t really separate the two that way; as much as the creationists want to focus on Charles Darwin as if none of this would have been happening if not for him, the concepts would have been there in nature with or without Darwin’s surprisingly lucid early exploration of them, and what the creationists and IDers really have a problem with isn’t Charles Darwin himself but really more or less everyone since 1850 who’s ever tried to look at Biology as a unifiable concept.    From Wordnik.com.  [The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design Review: Quote-Mining, Trivializing, and Generally Getting it Wrong (Chapter 7) - The Panda's Thumb] Reference