But where a way is mentioned collaterally in pleading, as the abuttal of the principal subject, the same precision is not necessary.    From Wordnik.com.  [Reports of cases argued and determined in the Court of exchequer, from Easter term 32 George III. to [Trinity term 37 George III.] ... both inclusive. [1792-1797]] Reference

The plaintiff has undertaken to de -- scribe the highway, but this roust be understood with reference to the subject, with such certainty asis requisite in describing an abuttal.    From Wordnik.com.  [Reports of cases argued and determined in the Court of exchequer, from Easter term 32 George III. to [Trinity term 37 George III.] ... both inclusive. [1792-1797]] Reference

To describe the high - way at full length, it should be stated to be "in, through, and from the parish of L.;" but any part of that description which ascertains the identity of the road is a sufficient description of an abuttal.    From Wordnik.com.  [Reports of cases argued and determined in the Court of exchequer, from Easter term 32 George III. to [Trinity term 37 George III.] ... both inclusive. [1792-1797]] Reference